Stop Being a Helicopter Manager: The Coaching Revolution Australian Workplaces Actually Need

The worst manager I ever worked under spent more time breathing down my neck than actually leading the team. Sound familiar?

After fifteen years in various leadership roles across Melbourne and Sydney, I've watched countless managers fall into the same trap: thinking that directing equals leading. It doesn't. And frankly, it's killing productivity in Australian workplaces faster than you can say "micromanagement."

Here's what I've learned the hard way: the difference between coaching and directing isn't just semantics – it's the difference between having a team that performs because they have to, and having one that performs because they want to.

The Great Australian Management Mistake

We've got this backwards idea that good management means having all the answers. Wrong. Dead wrong.

I used to be that manager. You know the type – the one who'd swoop in with solutions before anyone had even finished explaining the problem. I thought I was being efficient. Turns out, I was just creating a team of order-takers instead of problem-solvers.

The coaching approach flips this completely. Instead of "Here's what you need to do," it becomes "What do you think would work best here?" Instead of giving directions, you're asking questions that help people find their own solutions.

And before you roll your eyes and mutter something about "soft skills nonsense," let me share something that might surprise you: teams that receive coaching-style leadership show 67% higher engagement scores than those under traditional directive management. That's not touchy-feely rubbish – that's measurable business impact.

When to Coach, When to Direct

Now, I'm not suggesting you throw out all directive leadership. That would be like trying to run a restaurant without any recipes. Sometimes you absolutely need to be direct:

• Emergency situations (obviously)
• When someone's completely new and needs clear structure
• Safety-critical procedures
• Tight deadlines with no room for experimentation

But here's where most managers get it wrong: they use directing as their default mode, when coaching should be the standard and directing should be the exception.

I learned this lesson during a particularly stressful project rollout three years ago. My natural instinct was to micromanage every detail, assign specific tasks, and check in hourly. Instead, I forced myself to ask questions: "What's your biggest concern about this deadline?" "What resources would help you succeed?" "What's worked well in similar situations?"

The results? We delivered two days early, and the team felt ownership over the success instead of just relief that I'd stopped hovering.

The Art of Asking Better Questions

Coaching isn't just about asking questions – it's about asking the right questions. And honestly, this is where most Australian managers fall flat. We're culturally programmed to be direct, which serves us well in many contexts but can work against us in coaching situations.

Instead of "Why haven't you finished this yet?" try "What's preventing you from moving forward on this?"

Instead of "That's not how we do things," try "Help me understand your thinking on this approach."

Instead of "You need to improve your time management," try "What changes would help you feel more in control of your workload?"

See the difference? The first set of questions puts people on the defensive. The second set invites collaboration and problem-solving.

Real Results from Real Workplaces

Let me tell you about Sarah, a team leader at a professional development training company I worked with last year. She came to me frustrated because her team kept coming to her with every minor decision. "I'm spending more time solving their problems than doing my own work," she complained.

We shifted her approach from directive to coaching over about six weeks. Instead of immediately providing solutions, she started asking questions that helped her team think through problems themselves. The transformation was remarkable – not just in terms of her workload, but in the quality of solutions her team was generating.

Within three months, her team's initiative scores had improved by 45%, and Sarah was able to focus on strategic work instead of constant firefighting. More importantly, her team reported feeling more trusted and valued.

This isn't an isolated case. I've seen similar results across industries – from construction sites in Brisbane to tech startups in Perth. The principle remains the same: when you coach instead of direct, you're not just solving today's problem, you're building tomorrow's problem-solvers.

The Uncomfortable Truth About Control

Here's something that might make you squirm: if you're addicted to directing, you're probably addicted to control. And that addiction is costing you more than you realise.

When you constantly direct, you create dependency. Your team becomes reliant on your decisions, your solutions, your thinking. Sure, it might feel good in the short term – you're important, needed, indispensable. But you're also creating a bottleneck with yourself at the centre.

Coaching requires letting go of that control. It means accepting that your way might not always be the best way (gasp!). It means being comfortable with the fact that your team might take longer to reach a solution initially, but they'll be faster and more independent in the long run.

I'll admit, this was hard for me. Really hard. There's something deeply satisfying about being the person with all the answers. But there's something far more satisfying about watching your team develop their own expertise and confidence.

Common Coaching Mistakes (And How to Avoid Them)

After working with hundreds of managers transitioning from directive to coaching styles, I've seen the same mistakes repeated:

The Leading Question Trap: Asking questions designed to guide people to your predetermined answer isn't coaching – it's manipulation with extra steps. If you already know what you want them to do, just say so.

The Therapy Session: Coaching in the workplace isn't about exploring deep emotional issues or childhood experiences. Keep it professional and task-focused.

The Endless Question Loop: Sometimes people genuinely don't know the answer, and that's okay. If someone's struggling after a few good questions, it might be time to provide some direction or guidance.

The One-Size-Fits-All Approach: Some people respond better to coaching, others prefer clear direction. Good leaders adapt their style to the individual and the situation.

Building a Coaching Culture

Individual coaching skills are important, but the real magic happens when you create a culture where coaching becomes the norm. This means training your entire leadership team, not just hoping it trickles down.

Professional communication workshops can be invaluable for this. I've seen organisations transform their entire management approach through structured training programs that teach these skills systematically.

It also means changing your recognition and reward systems. If you only celebrate results, people will focus on getting results any way they can – usually through directive methods because they're faster in the short term. Start recognising and rewarding development, growth, and the building of team capabilities.

The Australian Advantage

Here's something interesting: Australians actually have some natural advantages when it comes to coaching-style leadership. Our cultural tendency toward egalitarianism means we're often more comfortable with collaborative approaches than hierarchical ones.

We're also naturally inclined to "have a chat" about problems rather than issuing edicts from on high. The challenge is channelling this natural inclination into structured coaching conversations that actually drive results.

The problem is we often don't trust our instincts. We think good management has to look like what we see in American business books or Hollywood movies – the authoritative leader who makes quick decisions and gives clear orders. But that's not necessarily what works best in Australian workplaces.

Making the Transition

If you're ready to shift from directing to coaching, start small. Pick one person on your team and commit to asking at least two questions before offering any solutions in your next conversation with them.

Notice how it feels. Notice their response. Most importantly, notice the quality of the solutions they come up with when given the space to think.

Don't expect perfection immediately – from them or from yourself. This is a skill that develops over time, and it requires practice and patience.

The Bottom Line

Coaching vs. directing isn't about being soft or hard, nice or tough. It's about being effective. And in today's workplace, where innovation and adaptability are crucial, building thinking, problem-solving team members isn't just nice to have – it's essential for survival.

The managers who figure this out first will have the competitive advantage. The ones who don't will find themselves increasingly irrelevant in a world that values agility over authority.

So what's it going to be? Are you going to keep being the person with all the answers, or are you going to start building a team full of people who can find their own solutions?

The choice is yours. Choose wisely.

---

Related Reading:

• Managing Workplace Anxiety Training
• Building Effective Professional Networks